#1
|
||||
|
||||
Possible Rental Delay Coming For Major New Releases!
This could be the blow that finally does Blockbuster in if this does indeed come to fruition.
By Ben Fritz October 23, 2009 For those who like renting movies, Hollywood may soon have a message: Prepare to wait. In an effort to push consumers toward buying more movies, some major film studios are considering a new policy that would block DVDs from being offered for rental until several weeks after going on sale. Under the plan, new DVD releases would be available on a purchase-only basis for a few weeks, after which time companies such as Blockbuster Inc. and Netflix Inc. would be allowed to rent the DVDs to their customers. The move comes as the studios are grappling with sharply declining DVD revenue, which has long propped up the movie business. Reed Hastings, chief executive of DVD-by-mail company Netflix, revealed that he had discussed delayed-rental proposals with several of his biggest suppliers. People close to the situation at several studios confirmed that such plans were under consideration and probably would take effect next year. "The studios are wrestling with declines in DVD sales while the DVD rental market has been modestly growing," Hastings said on a conference call Thursday with analysts after Netflix reported impressive 24% revenue growth last quarter. "One of the mitigating steps some are considering is introducing a DVD retail sales-only window for a few weeks." DVD sales have been hurt by the recession, which has caused tapped-out consumers to opt for cheaper rentals. But Hollywood studios prefer that consumers buy DVDs because that generates significantly higher profits than rentals. 20th Century Fox, Universal Pictures and Warner Bros. have all tried to impose a no-rental period of about a month on Redbox, the operator of kiosks that rent movies for $1 per night. Those studios believe Redbox's steeply discounted price undercuts DVD sales. Redbox has responded by suing the studios, seeking to force them to sell it DVDs simultaneously with competitors. Meanwhile, the company is stocking its kiosks with DVDs it can't otherwise obtain by buying them from retailers. Hollywood's concern about Redbox is heightened by the company's rapid growth. In the first six months of the year, Redbox's revenue soared 113%. Industrywide DVD sales, however, were down 13.5% in the same period, according to the Digital Entertainment Group, in part because consumers are embracing low-cost rental offerings. There is also growing concern among studios with Netflix, which reported Thursday that subscribers increased 28% from last year to 11.1 million as of Sept. 30. Netflix and Redbox account for virtually all of this year's growth of about 9% in DVD rental revenue. Studios considering the plan are betting that a sales-only window would push some consumers who currently rent DVDs into buying them, thus boosting profits. "The studios might try to implement something like this to increase demand for sales," said Wade Holden, an analyst at SNL Kagan, "because they need to protect that revenue stream the best they can." Such a move would undoubtedly decrease revenue for DVD rental companies. That might not only crimp the growth of Netflix and Redbox, but also further depress struggling rental chain Blockbuster, whose revenue fell 20% in the first half of the year. Depending on the details, however, a sales-only window might not hurt the bottom line of major rental companies. To get them on board, studios probably would have to offer them a lower wholesale price than that paid by retailers, currently $18 for most standard DVDs and $25 for high-definition Blu-ray discs. "If we can agree on low-enough pricing," observed Hastings, "delayed rental could potentially increase profits for everyone." A universal delay for all rental companies might also end the ongoing dispute of three studios with Redbox. A company spokesman implied that Redbox would go along with a sales-only window if it wasn't singled out: "We must have a level playing field and the right to buy movies at the same time as any of our competitors," he said. Whether consumers go along with it, however, may be another matter entirely. http://www.latimes.com/business/la-f...tory?track=rss
__________________
"It's not a god damn helicopter Senator, it's Airwolf!" |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
If the delay was applied across the board (red, net and BB), I have to wonder how big of an impact it would have. There are a handful of major hits that I could see people buying more if there was a delay before they could rent it. But those movies are in the minority. We rented a shitload of that horrible Year One, but can you see many customers thinking "I can't wait a few weeks to have it, I must own it NOW!"
I tend to think that for most movies and most customers, the rental release date would just become the new de facto street date.
__________________
Why does this pic somehow remind me of Blockbuster? [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to abhorrent scowl For This Useful Post: | ||
Ghost of AtlanticVamp (October 27th, 2009), yodavsjason (October 27th, 2009) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
For a minute, from the thread title, I thought it was another "Blockbuster can't pay their suppliers" issue. At least this goes across the board. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
And it's not like we wouldn't have the retail in the store on the primary street date anyways.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I'm betting that horrible Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen rented shit loads too huh? *sigh*
__________________
"It's not a god damn helicopter Senator, it's Airwolf!" |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
But I still think the studios are nuts if they think that placing a delay between retail and rental will make a big difference for anything other than the hugest movies. People who rent 2 or 3 movies a week just aren't going to spend the money to own those same titles. And yes, Transformers is renting like mad. We got more bluray copies of this than any title I've seen before, and they are near impossible to find on the shelf. But you know what, I haven't seen anyone buy one.
__________________
Why does this pic somehow remind me of Blockbuster? [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
I, too, think that it will just mean people will wait. I mean look at the way customers act when you try and get them to pre-order a title. They are all for putting $5 down for the hot new blockbuster but as soon as you reiterate that it is to purchase the film and not rent it, they look at you like you have leprosy.
__________________
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
a) this means nothing; as others have said, people will just wait.
b) Hollywood's seething hatred against rental giants is currently aimed at Redbox and Netflix. If BBI can find some way to get back in the studios' good graces, maybe they'll get exclusive day-and-date rights. That doesn't sound like something BBI is smart enough to pull off, but stranger things have happened.
__________________
IHBB VISCOUNT OF WIT It puts the movie in the basket. It puts the movie in the basket! It drops the movie in the bin or else it gets the fee again. PUT THE FUCKING MOVIE IN THE FUCKING BASKET. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
What boggles my mind is that Hollywood blames the decline in sales on rentals, not the economy and shitty movies. Consumers WILL find a way to get these movies... probably illegally now.
I knew this would happen once they started butting heads with Redbox. |
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to orbitdvd For This Useful Post: | ||
charlied72 (November 1st, 2009), Woodstock (October 28th, 2009), yodavsjason (October 27th, 2009), zooworker (October 27th, 2009) |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Given what the music industry has taught us, I actually foresee plenty more movies just being downloaded illegally. Not like they're hard to find, or so some of my customers would like to remind me (say, a lot like teenagers telling everyone they smoke weed!!)
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|